This blog has moved

to http://jcg1013.tumblr.com/

EVO 4G vs iPhone 4

Two funny YouTube videos (warning - plenty of NSFW language [not safe for work]).

An EVO 4G Salesman Confronts an iPhone 4 Shopper
and the rebuttal
An EVO 4G Owner Walks Into an Apple Store

iPhone 4 or iOS 4 features

Three features that I find invaluable - folders, multitasking bar, and strong password. If you don't know how to use them, here is a quickie ...

To create folders, just go into screen edit mode (hold an icon until everything vibrates) and move an icon over another one - they will both be put into a folder. The OS will give the folder a name, but you can rename it. Each folder can hold up to 12 apps, but only the first 9 icons will show. You can remove an app from a folder by dragging it out of the folder. I've heard that some people have put almost everything into folders so they only have one or two home pages.

I had to look up how to get to the multitasking bar -- double-click the home button. A new row of icons will show up at the bottom of the screen. These are your most recently used or currently running apps. Since most apps have not been recompiled to make them pause when you navigate away from them, when you click on an icon, that app will start up just as if you had clicked its icon on one of the home pages. When an app gets recompiled to make it multi-tasking-aware, then when you navigate away from it, it will pause, and then when you click on its icon in the multitasking bar, it will resume right where you left off.

To remove an icon from the list (to to kill it if it is paused), just hold down one of the icons until they all start to shake and click the minus sign to remove it. You can swipe to the left to see more icons. If you are at the beginning of the list and swipe to the RIGHT, you will get quick access to your ipod controls PLUS the hidden orientation lock button.

Finally, if you want more than a four digit passcode, go into Settings, General, Passcode Lock and turn "Simple Passcode" to OFF. It's a bit of a pain, but some of you may want this.

Multiple Home Pages

Here is a little javascript trick [if you use NoScript, click here to skip to that section].

I have been using isc.sans.edu as my home page for some time. But today, I wanted my home page to alternate between isc.sans.edu and also infosecevents.net. So, I used a little javascript:

Open Tools / Options, paste this into "Home Page" and click OK:

javascript:var d=new Date();var h=d.getMinutes()%2;if(h==0){document.location="http://infosecevents.net"}else{document.location="http://isc.sans.edu"}

[It should paste as a single line - if not, you may have to copy/paste in pieces]

Now, click on the home page button in your toolbar and see what comes up. Then wait a minute and do it again. Cool, eh?

There are some tweaks you can make:
1. if you want the home page to change less often, you can use getHours instead of getMinutes (or go the other way with getSeconds).
2. if you want to alternate between more than two pages, try something like this (i tried a switch/case instead of the if/else, but it didn't work):

javascript:var d=new Date();var h=d.getMinutes()%4;if(h==0){document.location="http://infosecevents.net"}else if(h==1){document.location="http://isc.sans.edu"}else if (h==2){document.location="http://iamneurotic.com/"}else if (h==3){document.location="http://starnull.blogspot.com/"}

The NoScript section

Obviously, none of this is going to work if you have disallowed javascript (say, if you're using NoScript in Firefox) on the page you're on (which includes the page that opens in a new window). In that case, you can put the javascript into a local file (say, on your desktop) -- this is the equivalent of the previous example:

<xxript>
var d=new Date();
var h=d.getMinutes()%4;
if (h==0) {document.location="http://infosecevents.net"} else
if (h==1) {document.location="http://isc.sans.edu"} else
if (h==2) {document.location="http://iamneurotic.com/"} else
if (h==3) {document.location="http://starnull.blogspot.com/"}
</script>

Call it something.htm and double-click it. When Firefox opens, it will not recognize the xxript on the first line, but that is a good thing. Open Tools / Options and click "Use Current Page" under "Home Page" and click OK. Now, go back to your file and change "xxript" on the first line to "script".

Test it by starting up Firefox the way you normally do (desktop icon, quick launch icon, whatever). Ta da. The home page comes up. The only caveat here is that if you're on a page on which you have disallowed javascript and you try to hit the home page button, nothing will happen.

Have fun!

On the BS of Positive Thinking

Barbara Ehrenreich on the BS of "positive thinking" - neat video clip: http://ping.fm/dO0yK. her book "Bright-Sided" is fantastic. (via Twitter @hypatiadotca)

iPhone / iPad screen films and cases

I've tried screen films for both iPhone and iPad, not so much for protection, but for glare reduction and finger gook reduction.

By far, the best was the anti-glare film for iPhone 3G from Power Support (was in the green package when the Apple Store was still selling screen protectors); they also have clear ones. It was, by far, the easiest to install, never noticed any fingerprints, finger feel was exceptional, and the artifacting from the matte screen was minimal.

Eventually, after 18 months, it started coming up at the edges due to an ill-fitting pong research case that continually scraped the edge of the film, causing crud to build up under the edges, so i had to replace the film (I removed the case and have not replaced it).

Since I plan to get an iPhone 4, i didn't want to waste money on a film i was only going to use for a few months, so i tried the clear film that came free with my old ifrogz case. Very decent film, although it isn't quite clear (some rainbowing if you look at it closely from the side), finger feel is acceptable, but not as good as Power Support, and the smudge protection isn't as good, but it will do for the next month.

BTW - I had the ifrogz case before the pong case - it lasted about a year but I had to replace it because the thin piece of plastic between the home button and the recharger slot cracked and eventually came off. This was probably due to stress from putting it in the dock every night for recharging. That shouldn't happen, but I would still consider them for my iPhone 4 case. The case had an excellent hand-feel and looked very nice. My wife has the crystal clear ifrogz case, loves the way it feels in her hand and has had zero problems with it (the crystal case is slightly thicker than the color cases).

On to the iPad. I'm using the Apple case and like it primarily for the thinness. I've considered others but they all add too much bulk to it. As for screen films, I haven't had much luck.

At first, I tried the highly-regarded ZAGG invisible shield. It was impossible for me to install properly and had really poor finger-feel (finger drags and skips across the screen), so i returned it. True to their word, they do refund the film even though I tried to use it and failed, so if you want to try it anyway (because other people seem to like it), i would still recommend them for that reason.

After that, I tried a cheap ChiTek film which went on well, but i'll replace it soon. The finger feel is acceptable, but there is a lot of rainbowing that you can see, even head-on. For $5, you can't beat it if you want a cheap film.

I've decided to replace the iPad film (and get one for my 13" MacBook) with anti-glare films from Photodon since I had a lot of success with their anti-glare film for my wife's 20" iMac. I'll let you know how it goes.

BTW - has anyone out there used the ZAGG smartBuds? I like the idea of the buds hanging close to my ears, even when they're out, but I have a 20" neck and it looks like it might be a tight fit.

How does Fortinet filter web sites ?

I don't know about you, but I have gotten a lot of really bad results from Fortinet's web filtering service; the most recent is in the picture below. The link mentioned goes to a web site that offers the Google Books Downloader app for Macintosh. Even looking at the upper level domain (from a machine outside the reach of Fortinet), there is nothing there that is even remotely racy, much less pornographic.

I wonder who they hire to look at these web sites and rate them? Maybe this site happened to fall into the hands of a Google-hater or Mac-hater for review? I don't know, but my own experience tells me that I were ever in the position to buy such a service, Fortinet would be at the bottom of the list.

One could argue that maybe the web site was hacked and showed porno for a short time and that's why it was rated the way it was. I would counter back that Fortinet has a responsibility not to slander employees of the organizations that use their service. They are a security firm and could, for porno and other "bad" tags, send the web site to a level 2 person before applying the tag. The analysis would go something like this:

1. Did the web site ever have a different rating? If so, it probably deserves a rating like "Hacked" which means that it temporarily goes somewhere "bad" but the person who went there did not intend to go somewhere "bad".

2. If they never saw the web site before, then can they infer anything by looking at the forensics (whois, archive.org, does anyone link to them, etc).

3. Then, if they do say it was "Hacked", come back regularly to see if the rating should change.

This lets the organization block "hacked" web sites, while not impugning the reputation of those who innocently go to those web sites.

Seems like something a responsible organization would do. I hope that Fortinet would consider such a course of action for themselves since I believe that they want to do the right thing (proactively try to apply responsible ratings) vs doing the make-a-quick-buck thing (report whatever they want and let the users tell them when they make a mistake, or hide behind "the organization is not supposed to take the ratings literally and should do their own investigation" - like that ever happens).

Update: after reporting the problem to Fortinet, they corrected it in less than an hour. That normally does not happen this quickly when I report errors to them, so maybe it was the fact that I publicly tweeted it to their Twitter address @Fortinet that got them to act quickly (hint for others out there who have rating problems). In either case, I appreciate their quick action, but wish that they acted, in my opinion, in a more responsible manner to start with.